|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
1. ORGANIZATION
Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (together with our consolidated subsidiaries, the "Company," "ACRE," "we," "us" and "our") is a Maryland corporation that was incorporated on September 1, 2011, and was initially funded and commenced investment operations on December 9, 2011. The Company is focused primarily on originating, investing in and managing middle-market commercial real estate ("CRE") loans and other CRE-related investments. ACRE completed the initial public offering (the "IPO") of its common stock on May 1, 2012. The Company is externally managed by Ares Commercial Real Estate Management LLC ("ACREM" or our "Manager"), a Securities and Exchange Commission registered investment adviser and a wholly owned subsidiary of Ares Management LLC, a global alternative asset manager and also a Securities and Exchange Commission registered investment adviser.
The Company's target investments include: "transitional senior" mortgage loans, "stretch senior" mortgage loans, subordinate debt mortgage loans such as B-notes and mezzanine loans and other select CRE debt and preferred equity investments. "Transitional senior" mortgage loans provide strategic, flexible, short-term financing solutions on transitional CRE middle-market assets that are the subject of a business plan that is expected to enhance the value of the property. They are usually funded over time as the borrower's business plan for the property is executed, and have a lower initial loan-to-value ratio as compared to "stretch senior" mortgage loans, with the loan-to-value ratios increasing as the loan is further funded over time. "Stretch senior" mortgage loans provide flexible "one stop" financing on quality CRE middle-market assets that are typically stabilized or near-stabilized properties with healthy balance sheets and steady cash flows, with the mortgage loans having higher leverage (and thus higher loan-to-value ratios) than conventional mortgage loans and are typically fully funded at closing and non-recourse to the borrower (as compared to conventional mortgage loans, which are usually full recourse to the borrower).
The Company intends to elect and qualify to be taxed as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), commencing with the Company's taxable year ended December 31, 2012. The Company generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes on the Company's REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains, to the extent that the Company annually distributes all of its REIT taxable income to stockholders and complies with various other requirements as a REIT.
|
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), and includes the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. The consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments and reclassifications that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for the fair presentation of the Company's results of its operations and financial condition as of and for the periods presented. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include funds on deposit with financial institutions.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash includes escrow deposits for taxes, insurance, leasing outlays, capital expenditures, tenant security deposits, and payments required under certain loan agreements. These escrow deposits are held on behalf of the respective borrowers and are offset by escrow liabilities included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and loans held for investment. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions and, at times, cash held may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or "FDIC", insured limit. The Company has exposure to credit risk on its CRE loans and other target investments. The Company's Manager will seek to manage credit risk by performing credit fundamental analysis of potential collateral assets.
Loans Held for Investment
The Company originates CRE debt and related instruments generally to be held for investment and to maturity. Loans that are held for investment are carried at cost, net of unamortized loan fees and origination costs, unless the loans are deemed impaired.
Impairment occurs when it is deemed probable that the Company will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. If a loan is considered to be impaired, the Company will record an allowance to reduce the carrying value of the loan to the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's contractual effective rate.
Each loan classified as held for investment is evaluated for impairment on a periodic basis. Loans are collateralized by real estate and as a result, the extent and impact of any credit deterioration associated with the performance and/or value of the underlying collateral property, as well as the financial and operating capability of the borrower could impact the expected amounts received and are therefore regularly evaluated. The Company monitors performance of its investment portfolio under the following methodology (1) borrower review, which analyzes the borrower's ability to execute on its original business plan, reviews its financial condition, assesses pending litigation and considers its general level of responsiveness and cooperation; (2) economic review, which considers underlying collateral, (i.e. leasing performance, unit sales and cash flow of the collateral and its ability to cover debt service as well as the residual loan balance at maturity); (3) property review, which considers current environmental risks, changes in insurance costs or coverage, current site visibility, capital expenditures and market perception; and (4) market review, which analyzes the collateral from a supply and demand perspective of similar property types, as well as from a capital markets perspective. Such impairment analyses are completed and reviewed by asset management and finance personnel who utilize various data sources, including periodic financial data such as property occupancy, tenant profile, rental rates, operating expenses, and the borrower's exit plan, among other factors.
In addition, we evaluate the entire portfolio to determine whether the portfolio has any impairments that require a general valuation allowance on the remainder of the loan portfolio. As of December 31, 2012, there are no impairments on the Company's loan portfolio.
Underwriting Commissions and Offering Costs
Underwriting commissions and offering costs incurred in connection with common stock offerings are reflected as a reduction of additional paid-in capital. Costs incurred that are not directly associated with the completion of a common stock offering are expensed. Underwriting commissions that are the responsibility of and paid by a related party, such as our Company's Manager, are reflected as a contribution of additional paid in capital from a sponsor in the consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
Interest income is accrued based on the outstanding principal amount and the contractual terms of each loan. Origination fees, contractual exit fees and direct loan origination costs are also recognized in interest income over the initial loan term as a yield adjustment using the effective interest method.
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs are capitalized and amortized over the terms of the respective debt instrument.
Fair Value Measurements
The Company determines the estimated fair value of financial assets and liabilities using the three-tier fair value hierarchy established by GAAP, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. GAAP establishes market-based or observable inputs as the preferred source of values, followed by valuation models using management assumptions in the absence of market inputs. The only financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the Company's consolidated financial statements are derivative instruments. The Company has not elected the fair value option for the remaining financial instruments, including loans held for investment, secured funding agreements and other debt instruments. Such financial instruments are carried at cost. Fair value is separately disclosed (see Note 9). The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:
Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2—Prices are determined using other significant observable inputs. Observable inputs are inputs that other market participants would use in pricing a security. These may include quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk and others.
Level 3—Prices are determined using significant unobservable inputs. In situations where quoted prices or observable inputs are unavailable (for example, when there is little or no market activity for an investment at the end of the period), unobservable inputs may be used.
Stock Based Compensation
The Company recognizes the cost of stock based compensation and payment transactions using the same expense category as would be charged for payments in cash. The fair value of the restricted stock or restricted stock units granted is recorded to expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period for the award, with an offsetting increase in stockholders' equity. For grants to directors and officers, the fair value is determined based upon the market price of the stock on the grant date.
Earnings per Share
The Company calculates basic earnings (loss) per share by dividing net income (loss) allocable to common stockholders for the period by the weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding for that period after consideration of the earnings (loss) allocated to the Company's restricted stock and restricted stock units, which are participating securities as defined in GAAP. Diluted earnings (loss) per share takes into effect any dilutive instruments, such as restricted stock and restricted stock units and convertible debt, except when doing so would be anti-dilutive.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company does not hold or issue derivative instruments for trading purposes. The Company recognizes derivatives on its balance sheet, measures them at their estimated fair value using Level III inputs under an option pricing model and recognizes changes in their estimated fair value in the Company's results of operations for the period in which the change occurs. On December 19, 2012, the Company issued $69.0 million aggregate principal amount of unsecured 7.000% Convertible Senior Notes due 2015 (the "2015 Convertible Notes"). The conversion features of the 2015 Convertible Notes are deemed to be an embedded derivative under Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging ("ASC 815"). In accordance with ASC 815, the Company is required to bifurcate the embedded derivative related to the conversion features of the 2015 Convertible Notes. The Company will recognize the embedded derivative as a liability on its balance sheet, measure it at its estimated fair value and recognize changes in its estimated fair value in the Company's results of operations for the period in which the change occurs.
Income Taxes
The Company intends to elect and qualify for taxation as a REIT. As a result of the Company's expected REIT qualification and its distribution policy, the Company does not generally expect to pay U.S. federal corporate level income taxes. Many of the REIT requirements, however, are highly technical and complex. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that the Company distribute annually at least 90% of the Company's REIT taxable income to the Company's stockholders. If the Company has previously qualified as a REIT and fails to qualify as a REIT in any subsequent taxable year and does not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, the Company will be subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) and may be precluded from qualifying as a REIT for the Company's four subsequent taxable years. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain U.S. federal, state, local and foreign taxes on the Company's income and property and to U.S. federal income and excise taxes on the Company's undistributed REIT taxable income.
ASC 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. ASC 740 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company has analyzed its various federal and state filing positions and believes that its income tax filing positions and deductions are well documented and supported. As of December 31, 2012, the Company has not recorded a reserve for any uncertain income tax positions; therefore, there has been no interest or penalties incurred to date.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates include the valuation of derivatives.
Segment Reporting
For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company operated in one business segment. The Company is primarily engaged in originating, investing in and managing commercial mortgage loans and other CRE related debt investments.
|
3. LOANS HELD FOR INVESTMENT
As of December 31, 2012, the Company has originated or co-originated 15 loans secured by CRE middle market properties. The aggregate originated commitment under these loans at closing was approximately $405.7 million, of which $356.7 in total principal remained outstanding as of December 31, 2012. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company had funded approximately $351.9 million and received repayments of $180 thousand on its net $405.7 million of commitments at closing as described in more detail in the tables below. Such investments are referred to herein as the Company's investment portfolio. The following tables present an overview of the Company's current investment portfolio, based on information available as of December 31, 2012. References to LIBOR are to 30-day LIBOR (unless otherwise specifically stated).
(amounts in millions, except percentages)
Loan Type |
Location | Total Commitment (at closing) |
Outstanding Principal |
Carrying Amount(1) |
Interest Rate |
LIBOR Floor |
Unleveraged Effective Yield(2) |
Maturity Date(3) |
Payment Terms(4) |
||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Transitional Senior Mortgage Loans |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Apartment |
Brandon, FL | $ | 49.6 | $ | 43.4 | $ | 42.9 | (5) | L+4.80% | 0.5 | % | 5.9 | % | Jan 2016 | I/O | ||||||||||||
Office |
Austin, TX | 38.0 | 30.8 | 30.5 | L+5.75%- L+5.25% |
(6) |
1.0 | % | 7.5 | % | Mar 2015 | I/O | |||||||||||||||
Apartment |
New York, NY | 36.1 | 30.8 | 30.5 | L+5.00% | 0.8 | % | 6.1 | % | Oct 2017 | I/O | ||||||||||||||||
Office |
Cincinnati, OH | 35.5 | 26.9 | 26.7 | L+5.35% | (7) | 0.3 | % | 6.0 | % | Nov 2015 | I/O | |||||||||||||||
Apartment |
New York, NY | 26.3 | 22.7 | 22.5 | L+5.75%- L+5.00% |
(8) |
0.2 | % | 6.5 | % | Dec 2015 | I/O | |||||||||||||||
Apartment |
New York, NY | 21.9 | 18.4 | 18.3 | L+5.75%- L+5.00% |
(8) |
0.2 | % | 6.5 | % | Dec 2015 | I/O | |||||||||||||||
Apartment |
New York, NY | 21.8 | 18.6 | 18.4 | L+5.75%- L+5.00% |
(8) |
0.2 | % | 6.5 | % | Dec 2015 | I/O | |||||||||||||||
Apartment |
Avondale, AZ | 22.1 | 20.6 | 20.4 | L+4.25% | 1.0 | % | 5.8 | % | Sep 2015 | I/O | ||||||||||||||||
Office |
Denver, CO | 11.0 | 8.3 | 8.2 | L+5.50% | 1.0 | % | 7.3 | % | Jan 2015 | I/O | ||||||||||||||||
Stretch Senior Mortgage Loans |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Office |
Miami, FL | 47.0 | 47.0 | 46.6 | (5) | L+5.25% | 1.0 | % | 6.6 | % | Oct 2015 | I/O | |||||||||||||||
Office |
Boston, MA | 35.0 | 34.8 | 34.6 | L+5.65% | 0.7 | % | 6.8 | % | Mar 2015 | P&I | ||||||||||||||||
Apartment |
Arlington, VA | 13.4 | 13.4 | 13.3 | L+5.15% | 0.3 | % | 6.1 | % | Dec 2014 | I/O | ||||||||||||||||
Subordinated Debt Investments |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Apartment |
Rocklin, CA | 18.7 | 18.7 | (9) | 18.5 | L+6.40% | (10) | 1.0 | % | 10.0 | % | Dec 2013 | I/O | ||||||||||||||
Office |
Fort Lauderdale, FL | 15.0 | (11) | 8.0 | 7.9 | L+10.75%- L+8.18% |
(12) |
0.8 | % | 12.1 | % | Feb 2015 | I/O | ||||||||||||||
Office |
Atlanta, GA | 14.3 | 14.3 | 14.2 | 10.50% | (13) | — | 11.0 | % | Aug 2017 | I/O | ||||||||||||||||
Total/Average |
$ | 405.7 | $ | 356.7 | $ | 353.5 | 7.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
The Company's investments in mortgages and loans held for investment are accounted for at amortized cost. The following tables summarize the Company's loans held for investment as of December 31, 2012 and 2011:
|
December 31, 2012 | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$ in thousands |
Carrying Amount |
Outstanding Principal |
Weighted Average Interest Rate |
Weighted Average Unleveraged Effective Yield |
Weighted Average Remaining Life* (Years) |
|||||||||||
Senior mortgage loans |
$ | 312,883 | $ | 315,750 | 5.9 | % | 6.8 | % | 2.8 | |||||||
Subordinated and mezzanine loans |
40,617 | 41,000 | 9.9 | % | 11.4 | % | 2.4 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 353,500 | $ | 356,750 | 6.4 | % | 7.4 | % | 2.8 | |||||||
|
December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Carrying Amount |
Outstanding Principal |
Interest Rate |
Unleveraged Effective Yield |
Remaining Life* (Years) |
|||||||||||
Senior mortgage loans |
$ | 4,945 | $ | 5,055 | 6.5 | % | 6.6 | % | 3.0 | |||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2012, the activity in the Company's loan portfolio was as follows ($ in thousands):
Balance at December 31, 2011 |
$ | 4,945 | ||
Initial funding |
347,779 | |||
Receipt of origination fee, net of costs |
(3,540 | ) | ||
Additional funding |
4,096 | |||
Amortizing payments |
(180 | ) | ||
Origination fee accretion |
400 | |||
Balance at December 31, 2012 |
$ | 353,500 | ||
No impairment charges have been recognized as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
|
4. DEBT
Secured Funding Agreements
|
As of December 31, 2012 | As of December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$ in thousands |
Outstanding Balances |
Total Commitment |
Outstanding Balances |
Total Commitment |
|||||||||
Wells Fargo Facility |
$ | 98,196 | $ | 172,500 | $ | — | $ | 75,000 | |||||
Citibank Facility |
13,900 | 86,225 | — | 50,000 | |||||||||
Capital One Facility |
32,160 | 50,000 | — | — | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 144,256 | $ | 308,725 | $ | — | $ | 125,000 | |||||
The secured funding arrangements are generally collateralized by assignments of specific loans held for investment originated by the Company. The secured funding arrangements are guaranteed by the Company.
Generally, the Company partially offsets interest rate risk by matching the interest index of loans held for investments with the secured funding agreement used to fund them.
Wells Fargo Facility
On December 14, 2011, the Company entered into a $75.0 million secured revolving funding facility arranged by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the "Wells Fargo Facility"), pursuant to which the Company borrows funds to finance qualifying senior commercial mortgage loans and A-Notes, subject to available collateral. On May 22, 2012, the agreements governing the Wells Fargo Facility were amended to, among other things, increase the total commitment under the Wells Fargo Facility from $75.0 million to $172.5 million. Advances under the Wells Fargo Facility accrue interest at a per annum rate equal to the sum of (i) 30 day LIBOR plus (ii) a pricing margin range of 2.50%-2.75%. On May 15, 2012, the Company started to incur a non-utilization fee of 25 basis points on the average available balance of the Wells Fargo Facility. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company incurred a non-utilization fee of $222 thousand. The initial maturity date of the Wells Fargo Facility is December 14, 2014 and, provided that certain conditions are met and applicable extension fees are paid, is subject to two 12-month extension options. As of December 31, 2012, the outstanding balance on the Wells Fargo Facility was $98.2 million.
The Wells Fargo Facility contains various affirmative and negative covenants applicable to the Company and certain of the Company's subsidiaries, including the following: (a) limitations on the incurrence of additional indebtedness or liens, (b) limitations on how borrowed funds may be used, (c) limitations on certain distributions and dividend payments, (d) maintenance of adequate capital, (e) limitations on change of control, (f) maintaining a ratio of total debt to total assets of not more than 75%, (g) maintaining liquidity in an amount not less than the greater of (1) 5% of the Company's tangible net worth or (2) $20.0 million, (h) maintaining a fixed charge coverage ratio (expressed as the ratio of EBITDA to fixed charges) of at least 1.5 to 1, and (i) maintaining a tangible net worth of at least the sum of (1) $135.5 million, plus (2) 80% of the net proceeds raised in all future equity issuances by us. Effective June 29, 2012, the agreements governing the Wells Fargo Facility were further amended to provide that the required minimum fixed charge coverage ratio with respect to the Company as guarantor will start to be tested upon the earlier to occur of (a) the calendar quarter ending on June 30, 2013 and (b) the first full calendar quarter following the calendar quarter in which the Company reports "Loans held for investment" in excess of $200.0 million on its quarterly consolidated balance sheet. Since as of December 31, 2012 the Company reported "Loans held for investment" in excess of $200.0 million, the Company will be required to test the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio beginning with the quarter ended March 31, 2013. As of December 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance in all material respects with the terms of the Wells Fargo Facility.
Citibank Facility
On December 8, 2011, the Company entered into a $50.0 million secured revolving funding facility arranged by Citibank, N.A. (the "Citibank Facility") pursuant to which the Company borrows funds to finance qualifying senior commercial mortgage loans and A-Notes, subject to available collateral. On April 16, 2012 and May 1, 2012, the agreements governing the Citibank Facility were amended to, among other things, increase the total commitment under the Citibank Facility from $50.0 million to $86.2 million. Under the Citibank Facility, the Company borrows funds on a revolving basis in the form of individual loans. Each individual loan is secured by an underlying loan originated by the Company. Advances under the Citibank Facility accrue interest at a per annum rate based on LIBOR. The margin can vary between 2.50% and 3.50% over the greater of LIBOR and 0.5%, based on the debt yield of the assets contributed into ACRC Lender C LLC, one of the Company's wholly owned subsidiaries and the borrower under the Citibank Facility. On March 3, 2012, the Company started to incur a non-utilization fee of 25 basis points on the average available balance of the Citibank Facility. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company incurred a non-utilization fee of $133 thousand. The maturity date of each individual loan is the same as the maturity date of the underlying loan that secures such individual loan. The end of the funding period is December 8, 2013, and may be extended for an additional 12 months upon the payment of the applicable extension fee and provided that no event of default is then occurring. As of December 31, 2012, the outstanding balance on the Citibank Facility was $13.9 million.
The Citibank Facility contains various affirmative and negative covenants applicable to the Company and certain of the Company's subsidiaries, including the following: (a) maintaining tangible net worth of at least the sum of (1) 80% of the Company's tangible net worth as of May 1, 2012, plus (2) 80% of the total net capital raised in all future equity issuances by the Company, (b) maintaining liquidity in an amount not less than the greater of (1) $20.0 million or (2) 5% of the Company's tangible net worth, (c) a cap on the Company's distributions of the greater of (1) 100% of the Company's taxable net income, or (2) such amount as is necessary to maintain the Company's status as a REIT, and (d) if the Company's average debt yield across the portfolio of assets that are financed with the Citibank Facility falls below certain thresholds, the Company may be required to repay certain amounts under the Citibank Facility. The Citibank Facility also prohibits the Company from amending the management agreement with its Manager in a material respect without the prior consent of the lender. As of December 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance in all material respects with the terms of the Citibank Facility.
Capital One Facility
On May 18, 2012, the Company entered into a $50.0 million secured revolving funding facility with Capital One, National Association (the "Capital One Facility"), pursuant to which the Company borrows funds to finance qualifying senior commercial mortgage loans, subject to available collateral.
Under the Capital One Facility, the Company borrows funds on a revolving basis in the form of individual loans evidenced by individual notes. Each individual loan is secured by an underlying loan originated by us. Amounts outstanding under each individual loan accrue interest at a per annum rate equal to LIBOR plus a spread ranging between 2.50% and 4.00%. The Company may request individual loans under the Capital One Facility through and including May 18, 2014, subject to successive 12-month extension options at the lender's discretion. The maturity date of each individual loan is the same as the maturity date of the underlying loan that secures such individual loan. As of December 31, 2012, the outstanding balance on the Capital One Facility was $32.2 million. The Company does not incur a non-utilization fee under the terms of the Capital One Facility.
The Capital One Facility contains various affirmative and negative covenants applicable to the Company and certain of the Company's subsidiaries, including the following: (a) maintaining a ratio of debt to tangible net worth of not more than 3.0 to 1, (b) maintaining a tangible net worth of at least the sum of (1) 80% of the Company's tangible net worth as of May 1, 2012, plus (2) 80% of the net proceeds received from all future equity issuances by the Company, (c) maintaining a total liquidity in excess of the greater of (1) 5% of the Company's tangible net worth or (2) $20.0 million, and (d) maintaining a fixed charge coverage ratio (expressed as the ratio of EBITDA to fixed charges) of at least 1.5 to 1. Effective September 27, 2012, the agreements governing the Capital One Facility were amended to provide that the required minimum fixed charge coverage ratio with respect to the Company as guarantor will start to be tested upon the earlier to occur of (a) the calendar quarter ending on June 30, 2013 and (b) the first full calendar quarter following the calendar quarter in which the Company reports "Loans held for investment" in excess of $200.0 million on the Company's quarterly consolidated balance sheet. Since as of December 31, 2012 the Company reported "Loans held for investment" in excess of $200.0 million, the Company will be required to test the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio beginning with the quarter ended March 31, 2013. As of December 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance in all material respects with the terms of the Capital One Facility.
2015 Convertible Notes
On December 19, 2012, the Company issued $69.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 2015 Convertible Notes. Of this aggregate principal amount, $60.5 million aggregate principal amount of the 2015 Convertible Notes was sold to the initial purchasers (including $9.0 million pursuant to the initial purchasers' exercise in full of their overallotment option) and $8.5 million aggregate principal amount of the 2015 Convertible Notes was sold directly to certain directors, officers and other affiliates of the Company in a private placement. The 2015 Convertible Notes were issued pursuant to an Indenture, dated December 19, 2012 (the "Indenture"), between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee. The sale of the 2015 Convertible Notes generated net proceeds of approximately $66.2 million. Aggregate estimated offering expenses in connection with the transaction, including the initial purchasers' discount of approximately $2.1 million, were approximately $2.8 million. As of December 31, 2012, the carrying value of the 2015 Convertible Notes was $67.3 million.
The 2015 Convertible Notes bear interest at a rate of 7.000% per year, payable semiannually in arrears on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning on June 15, 2013. The estimated effective interest rate of the 2015 Convertible Notes, which is equal to the stated rate of 7.000% plus the accretion of the original issue discount and associated costs, was approximately 9.4% for the year ended December 31, 2012. As of December 31, 2012, the interest charged on this indebtedness was $216 thousand. The 2015 Convertible Notes will mature on December 15, 2015 (the "Maturity Date"), unless previously converted or repurchased in accordance with their terms. The 2015 Convertible Notes are the Company's senior unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of payment to the Company's existing and future indebtedness that is expressly subordinated in right of payment to the 2015 Convertible Notes; equal in right of payment to the Company's existing and future unsecured indebtedness that is not so subordinated; effectively junior in right of payment to any of the Company's secured indebtedness (including existing unsecured indebtedness that the Company later secures) to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness; and structurally junior to all existing and future indebtedness (including trade payables) incurred by the Company's subsidiaries, financing vehicles or similar facilities.
Prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding June 15, 2015 holders may convert their 2015 Convertible Notes only under certain circumstances as set forth in the Indenture. On or after June 15, 2015 until the close of business on the scheduled trading day immediately preceding the Maturity Date, holders may convert their 2015 Convertible Notes at any time. Upon conversion, the Company will pay or deliver, as the case may be, at its election, cash, shares of its common stock or a combination of cash and shares of its common stock, provided that the Company will not elect to use a settlement method that results in it issuing more than 1,853,432 shares of common stock prior to obtaining stockholder approval in accordance with certain New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") requirements. The conversion rate is initially 53.6107 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of 2015 Convertible Notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $18.65 per share of common stock). The conversion rate will be subject to adjustment in some events, including for regular quarterly dividends in excess of $0.35 per share, but will not be adjusted for any accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, if certain corporate events occur prior to the Maturity Date, the conversion rate will be increased but will in no event exceed 61.6523 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of 2015 Convertible Notes.
The Company may not elect to issue shares of common stock upon conversion of the 2015 Convertible Notes to the extent such election would result in the issuance of 20% or more of the common stock outstanding immediately prior to the issuance of the 2015 Convertible Notes until the Company receives stockholder approval for issuances above this threshold. Until such stockholder approval is obtained, the Company may not share-settle the full conversion option. As a result, the embedded conversion option does not qualify for equity classification and instead is separately valued and accounted for as a derivative liability. The initial value allocated to the derivative liability was $1.7 million, which represents a discount to the debt to be amortized through other interest expense using the effective interest method through the maturity of the 2015 Convertible Notes. The effective interest rate used to amortize the debt discount on the 2015 Convertible Notes is 9.4%. During each reporting period, the derivative liability is marked to fair value through earnings. As of December 31, 2012, the derivative liability had a fair value of $1.8 million. If the Company obtains stockholder approval for the issuance of 20% or more of the common stock outstanding immediately prior to the issuance of the 2015 Convertible Notes so the conversion option can be share-settled in full at the Company's option, the conversion option may qualify for equity classification and the bifurcated derivative liability would no longer need to be accounted for as a derivative on a prospective basis from the date of reassessment. Any remaining debt discount that arose at the date of debt issuance from the original bifurcation will continue to be amortized through other interest expense.
The Company does not have the right to redeem the 2015 Convertible Notes prior to the Maturity Date, except to the extent necessary to preserve its qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. No sinking fund is provided for the 2015 Convertible Notes. In addition, if the Company undergoes certain corporate events that constitute a "fundamental change," the holders of the 2015 Convertible Notes may require the Company to repurchase for cash all or part of their 2015 Convertible Notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2015 Convertible Notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the fundamental change repurchase date.
At December 31, 2012, approximate principal maturities of the Company's secured funding agreements and the 2015 Convertible Notes are as follows (amounts in thousands):
|
Wells Fargo Facility |
Citibank Facility |
Capital One Facility |
2015 Convertible Notes |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013 |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||
2014 |
98,196 | 9,490 | — | — | |||||||||
2015 |
— | 4,410 | 14,420 | 69,000 | |||||||||
2016 |
— | — | — | — | |||||||||
2017 |
— | — | 17,740 | — | |||||||||
Thereafter |
— | — | — | — | |||||||||
|
$ | 98,196 | $ | 13,900 | $ | 32,160 | $ | 69,000 | |||||
Weighted average effective rate |
2.8 | % | 3.4 | % | 3.1 | % | 9.4 | % |
|
5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company has various commitments to fund investments in its portfolio as described below.
As of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had the following commitments to fund various stretch senior and transitional senior mortgage loans, as well as subordinated and mezzanine debt investments:
|
As of | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$ in thousands |
December 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||
Total commitments |
$ | 405,695 | $ | 11,000 | |||
Less: funded commitments |
(356,930 | ) | (5,055 | ) | |||
Total unfunded commitments |
$ | 48,765 | $ | 5,945 | |||
The Company from time to time may be party to litigation relating to claims arising in the normal course of business. As of December 31, 2012, the Company is not aware of any legal claims.
|
6. SERIES A CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
On February 8, 2012, the Company's board of directors adopted resolutions classifying and designating 600 shares of authorized preferred stock as shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share ("Series A Preferred Stock"). Holders of shares of Series A Preferred Stock were entitled to receive, when and as authorized by the Company's board of directors and declared by us out of funds legally available for that purpose, dividends at the Prevailing Dividend Rate, compounded quarterly. The "Prevailing Dividend Rate" means (a) beginning on the issue date through and including December 31, 2012, 10% per annum, (b) beginning on January 1, 2013 through and including December 31, 2013, 11% per annum, (c) beginning on January 1, 2014 through and including December 31, 2014, 12% per annum, and (d) beginning on January 1, 2015 and thereafter, 13% per annum; provided, however, that the Prevailing Dividend Rate may decrease by certain specified amounts if the Company achieves a certain coverage ratio.
Shares of Series A Preferred Stock were redeemable by the Company at any time, in whole or in part, beginning on September 30, 2012, at the applicable redemption price. Additionally, shares of Series A Preferred Stock were redeemable at the option of the holder upon an IPO, at the applicable redemption price. Holders of shares of the Series A Preferred Stock exercised this redemption in connection with the IPO.
During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company issued 114.4578 shares of Series A Preferred Stock for an aggregate subscription price of approximately $5.7 million, paid a cash dividend of $102 thousand, and recognized the accretion of $572 thousand for the redemption premium for a total balance of approximately $6.3 million. The redemption price for redeemed shares of Series A Preferred Stock was equal to (i) the sum of (a) the subscription price, (b) any dividends per share added thereto pursuant to the terms of the Series A Preferred Stock and (c) any accrued and unpaid dividends per share plus (ii) an amount equal to a percentage of the subscription price of the Series A Preferred Stock and 10%.
|
7. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
In December 2011, Ares Investments Holdings LLC ("Ares Investments"), an affiliate of ACREM, contributed $6.6 million to the Company in exchange for the Company's agreement to effectively issue 330,000 shares of the Company's common stock upon an increase in the authorized number of shares of the Company's common stock. Although there were no shares of the Company's common stock issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2011, the accompanying consolidated financial statements assume these shares of common stock were issued to Ares Investments during the period ended December 31, 2011 for the purposes of additional paid-in capital, accumulated deficit, total stockholders' equity and earnings per share.
On January 25, 2012, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with Ares Investments, whereby Ares Investments agreed to purchase 400,000 shares of the Company's common stock for a total purchase price of $8.0 million, after giving effect to the reverse stock split on February 22, 2012.
On February 6, 2012, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with Ares Investments, whereby Ares Investments agreed to purchase 770,000 shares of the Company's common stock for a total purchase price of $15.4 million, after giving effect to the reverse stock split on February 22, 2012.
On February 8, 2012, the charter of the Company was amended and restated to increase the number of authorized shares of the Company's common stock and preferred stock to 95,000,000 and 5,000,000 shares, respectively. The par value remained at $0.01 per share.
On February 22, 2012, the Company's board of directors and Ares Investments approved a one-for-two reverse stock split whereby every two shares of common stock that were issued and outstanding immediately prior to this date were changed into one issued and outstanding share of the Company's common stock.
On April 23, 2012, the charter of the Company was amended to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock and preferred stock of the Company to 450,000,000 and 50,000,000 shares, respectively. The par value remained at $0.01 per share.
On May 1, 2012, the Company completed its IPO of 7,700,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $18.50 per share, raising approximately $142.5 million in gross proceeds. The underwriting commissions of approximately $5.3 million are reflected as a reduction of additional paid-in capital on the consolidated statement of stockholders' equity. Under the underwriting agreement, the Company's Manager was responsible for and paid directly the underwriting commissions. Because the Manager is a related party, the payment of underwriting commission of approximately $5.3 million by the Company's Manager is reflected as a contribution of additional paid-in capital on the consolidated statement of stockholders' equity in accordance with GAAP. The Company incurred approximately $3.5 million of expenses in connection with the IPO, which is reflected as a reduction in additional paid-in capital. The net proceeds to the Company totaled approximately $139.0 million. The Company used approximately $47.3 million of the net proceeds of the IPO to repay outstanding amounts under the Wells Fargo Facility and the Citibank Facility and approximately $6.3 million to redeem all of its issued shares of Series A Preferred Stock. The balance was used for general corporate working capital purposes and to make investments in the Company's target investments.
Equity Incentive Plan
On April 23, 2012, the Company adopted an equity incentive plan (the "2012 Equity Incentive Plan"). Pursuant to the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, the Company may grant awards consisting of restricted shares of the Company's common stock, restricted stock units and/or other equity-based awards to the Company's outside directors, the Company's Chief Financial Officer, ACREM and other eligible awardees under the plan, subject to an aggregate limitation of 690,000 shares of common stock (7.5% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company's common stock immediately after giving effect to the issuance of the shares sold in the IPO). Any restricted shares of the Company's common stock and restricted stock units will be accounted for under ASC 718, Stock Compensation, resulting in share-based compensation expense equal to the grant date fair value of the underlying restricted shares of common stock or restricted stock units.
On May 1, 2012, in connection with the IPO, the Company granted 5,000 restricted shares of common stock to each of the Company's five independent directors. In addition, on June 18, 2012, Mr. Rosen, an outside director, was granted 5,000 restricted shares of common stock as an award granted pursuant to the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. These awards of 5,000 restricted shares vest ratably on a quarterly basis over a three year period beginning on July 1, 2012. In addition, on May 1, 2012, each of the Company's five independent directors were granted approximately 2,027 restricted shares of common stock as 2012 annual compensation awards granted pursuant to the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. On June 18, 2012, Mr. Rosen was also granted 2,027 restricted shares of common stock as a 2012 annual compensation award granted pursuant to the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. These awards of 2,027 restricted shares in respect of annual directors' fees vest ratably on a quarterly basis over a one year period beginning on July 1, 2012. As of December 31, 2012, 4,998 shares of the total 30,000 restricted shares of common stock granted to Mr. Rosen and the Company's five independent directors, as initial grants in connection with the IPO have vested. As of December 31, 2012, 6,084 shares of the total 12,162 restricted shares of common stock granted to Mr. Rosen and the Company's five independent directors in respect of 2012 annual compensation have vested.
On July 9, 2012, in connection with his appointment as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, Tae-Sik Yoon was granted 25,000 restricted shares of the Company's common stock as an award granted pursuant to the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. These shares of restricted stock vest ratably on a quarterly basis over a four-year period that began on October 1, 2012, subject to certain conditions. As of December 31, 2012, 1,564 shares of the total 25,000 restricted shares of the Company's common stock granted to Mr. Yoon have vested.
Schedule of Non-Vested Share and Share Equivalents
|
Restricted Stock Grants—Directors |
Restricted Stock Grants—Officer |
Total | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance as of December 31, 2011 |
— | — | — | |||||||
Granted |
42,162 | 25,000 | 67,162 | |||||||
Vested |
(11,082 | ) | (1,564 | ) | (12,646 | ) | ||||
Forfeited |
— | — | — | |||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2012 |
31,080 | 23,436 | 54,516 | |||||||
Vesting Schedule
|
Restricted Stock Grants—Directors |
Restricted Stock Grants—Officer |
Total | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012 |
11,082 | 1,564 | 12,646 | |||||||
2013 |
16,080 | 6,250 | 22,330 | |||||||
2014 |
10,002 | 6,250 | 16,252 | |||||||
2015 |
4,998 | 6,250 | 11,248 | |||||||
2016 |
— | 4,686 | 4,686 | |||||||
Total |
42,162 | 25,000 | 67,162 | |||||||
The following table summarizes the compensation expense included in general and administrative expenses, the total fair value of shares vested and the aggregate grant date fair value of the restricted stock granted to the directors and officers of the Company (in thousands):
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Restricted Stock Grants—Directors |
Restricted Stock Grants—Officer |
Total | |||||||
Compensation expense included in general and administrative expenses |
$ | 285 | $ | 53 | $ | 338 | ||||
Total fair value of shares vested(1) |
182 | 26 | 208 | |||||||
Aggregate grant date fair value |
756 | 423 |
As of December 31, 2012, the total compensation cost related to non-vested awards not yet recognized totaled $20 thousand and the weighted-average period over which the non-vested awards are expected to be recognized is 2.57 years.
|
8. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following information sets forth the computations of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share for the year ended December 31, 2012 and for the period from September 1, 2011 (Inception) to December 31, 2011:
$ in thousands (except share and per share data) |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
For the Period From September 1, 2011 (Inception) to December 31, 2011 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders: |
$ | 186 | $ | (163 | ) | ||
Divided by: |
|||||||
Basic weighted average shares of common stock outstanding: |
6,532,706 | 19,052 | |||||
Diluted weighted average shares of common stock outstanding: |
6,567,309 | 19,052 | |||||
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share: |
$ | 0.03 | $ | (8.56 | ) | ||
The Company has considered the impact of the 2015 Convertible Notes and the restricted shares on diluted earnings per common share. The number of shares of common stock that the 2015 Convertible Notes are convertible into were not included in the computation of diluted net income per common share because the inclusion of those shares would have been anti-dilutive for the year ended December 31, 2012.
|
9. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company follows ASC 820-10, which expands the application of fair value accounting. ASC 820-10 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP and expands disclosure of fair value measurements. ASC 820-10 determines fair value to be the price that would be received for an investment in a current sale, which assumes an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The only financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the Company's consolidated financial statements are derivative instruments. The Company has not elected the fair value option for the remaining financial instruments, including loans held for investment, secured funding agreements and other debt instruments. Such financial instruments are carried at cost. ASC 820-10 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on the inputs used in measuring fair value. In accordance with ASC 820-10, these inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:
Level I—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level II—Prices are determined using other significant observable inputs. Observable inputs are inputs that other market participants would use in pricing a security. These may include quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk and others.
Level III—Prices are determined using significant unobservable inputs. In situations where quoted prices or observable inputs are unavailable (for example, when there is little or no market activity for an investment at the end of the period), unobservable inputs may be used.
GAAP requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the financial statements, for which it is practical to estimate the value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based upon the application of discount rates to estimated future cash flows using market yields, or other valuation methodologies. Any changes to the valuation methodology will be reviewed by the Company's management to ensure the changes are appropriate. The methods used may produce a fair value calculation that is not indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while the Company anticipates that the valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies, or assumptions, to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. The Company uses inputs that are current as of the measurement date, which may fall within periods of market dislocation, during which price transparency may be reduced.
Financial Instruments reported at fair value
The Company has certain assets and liabilities that are required to be recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with GAAP, including derivative instruments. The Company did not have any other financial instruments at December 31, 2012 or December 31, 2011 that were required to be carried at fair value. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, interest receivable and accrued expenses approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature.
The following table summarizes the levels in the fair value hierarchy into which the Company's financial instruments were categorized as of December 31, 2012 (in thousands):
|
Fair Value as of December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Level I | Level II | Level III | Total | |||||||||
Derivative instruments |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,825 | $ | 1,825 |
The valuation of derivative instruments are determined using widely accepted valuation techniques, including market yield analysis and discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs to the extent available, including interest rate curves, spot and market forward points.
The following table summarizes the significant unobservable inputs the Company used to value the derivative liability categorized within Level 3 as of December 31, 2012 (in thousands). The table is not intended to be all-inclusive, but instead captures the significant unobservable inputs relevant to the Company's determination of fair values (in thousands).
|
|
|
Unobservable Input | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Asset Category |
Fair Value |
Primary Valuation Technique |
Input | Range | Weighted Average |
||||||||
Derivative liability |
$ | 1,825 | Option Pricing Model | Volatility | 16.4% - 17.4% | 16.4 | % |
Changes in market yields, discount rates or EBITDA multiples, each in isolation, may change the fair value of the derivative liability. Generally, an increase in market yields or discount rates or decrease in EBITDA multiples may result in a decrease in the fair value of the derivative liability.
Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of derivative liabilities that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of the Company's derivative liability may fluctuate from period to period. Additionally, the fair value of the Company's derivative liability may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market existed for such derivative liability.
The changes in derivative instruments classified as Level III are as follows for the year ended December 31, 2012 (in thousands):
|
Derivative Instruments |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Beginning balance, January 1, 2012 |
$ | — | ||
Written option sold specific to the convertible debt offering |
(1,728 | ) | ||
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives |
(97 | ) | ||
Ending balance, as of December 31, 2012 |
$ | (1,825 | ) | |
The following table presents the carrying values and fair values of the Company's financial assets and liabilities recorded at cost as of December 31, 2012 and 2011. Changes in market yields, credit quality and other variables may change the fair value of the Company's assets and liabilities. All financial assets and liabilities recorded at cost are considered Level III financial instruments (in thousands).
|
As of December 31, 2012 |
As of December 31, 2011 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Carrying value |
Fair value | Carrying value |
Fair value | |||||||||
Financial Instruments not recorded at fair value: |
|||||||||||||
Loans held for investment |
$ | 353,500 | $ | 353,500 | $ | 4,945 | $ | 4,945 | |||||
Financial Liabilities: |
|||||||||||||
Secured financing agreements |
144,256 | 144,256 | — | — | |||||||||
Convertible notes |
67,289 | 67,289 | — | — |
|
10. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Management Agreements
The Company was party to an interim management agreement with ACREM prior to the IPO. Pursuant to the interim management agreement, ACREM provided investment advisory and management services to the Company on an interim basis until the IPO. For providing these services, ACREM received only reimbursements from the Company for any third party costs that ACREM incurred on behalf of the Company.
On April 25, 2012, in connection with the Company's IPO, the Company entered into a management agreement (the "Management Agreement") with ACREM under which ACREM, subject to the supervision and oversight of the Company's board of directors, will be responsible for, among other duties, (a) performing all of the Company's day-to-day functions, (b) determining the Company's investment strategy and guidelines in conjunction with the Company's board of directors, (c) sourcing, analyzing and executing investments, asset sales and financing and (d) performing portfolio management duties.
In addition, ACREM will have an Investment Committee that will oversee compliance with the Company's investment strategy and guidelines, investment portfolio holdings and financing strategy.
Effective May 1, 2012, in exchange for its services, ACREM is entitled to receive a base management fee, an incentive fee, expense reimbursements, grants of equity-based awards pursuant to the Company's 2012 Equity Incentive Plan and a termination fee, if applicable, as set forth below.
The base management fee is equal to 1.5% of the Company's stockholders' equity per annum and calculated and payable quarterly in arrears in cash. For purposes of calculating the management fee, stockholders' equity means: (a) the sum of (i) the net proceeds from all issuances of the Company's equity securities since inception (allocated on a pro rata daily basis for such issuances during the fiscal quarter of any such issuance), plus (ii) the Company's retained earnings at the end of the most recently completed fiscal quarter determined in accordance with GAAP (without taking into account any non-cash equity compensation expense incurred in current or prior periods); less (b) (x) any amount that the Company has paid to repurchase the Company's common stock since inception, (y) any unrealized gains and losses and other non-cash items that have impacted stockholders' equity as reported in the Company's financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP, and (z) one-time events pursuant to changes in GAAP, and certain non-cash items not otherwise described above, in each case after discussions between ACREM and the Company's independent directors and approval by a majority of the Company's independent directors. As a result, the Company's stockholders' equity, for purposes of calculating the management fee, could be greater or less than the amount of stockholders' equity shown on the Company's financial statements.
The incentive fee is equal to the difference between: (a) the product of (i) 20% and (ii) the difference between (A) the Company's Core Earnings (as defined below) for the previous 12-month period, and (B) the product of (1) the weighted average of the issue price per share of the Company's common stock of all of the Company's public offerings multiplied by the weighted average number of all shares of common stock outstanding (including any restricted shares of the Company's common stock, restricted units or any shares of the Company's common stock not yet issued, but underlying other awards granted under the Company's 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (See Note 7)) in the previous 12-month period, and (2) 8%; and (b) the sum of any incentive fees earned by ACREM with respect to the first three fiscal quarters of such previous 12-month period; provided, however, that no incentive fee is payable with respect to any fiscal quarter unless cumulative Core Earnings for the 12 most recently completed fiscal quarters is greater than zero. "Core Earnings" is a non-GAAP measure and is defined as GAAP net income (loss) computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding non-cash equity compensation expense, the incentive fee, depreciation and amortization (to the extent that any of the Company's target investments are structured as debt and the Company forecloses on any properties underlying such debt), any unrealized gains, losses or other non-cash items recorded in net income (loss) for the period, regardless of whether such items are included in other comprehensive income or loss, or in net income (loss), and one-time events pursuant to changes in GAAP and certain non-cash charges after discussions between ACREM and the Company's independent directors and after approval by a majority of the Company's independent directors. For purposes of calculating the incentive fee prior to the completion of a 12-month period following the IPO, Core Earnings will be calculated on the basis of the number of days that the Management Agreement has been in effect on an annualized basis. No incentive fees were earned for the year ended December 31, 2012 or for the period from September 1, 2011 (Inception) to December 31, 2011.
The Company reimburses ACREM at cost for operating expenses that ACREM incurs on the Company's behalf, including expenses relating to legal, financial, accounting, servicing, due diligence and other services. The Company's reimbursement obligation is not subject to any dollar limitation.
The Company will not reimburse ACREM for the salaries and other compensation of its personnel, except for the allocable share of the salaries and other compensation of the Company's (a) Chief Financial Officer, based on the percentage of his time spent on the Company's affairs and (b) other corporate finance, tax, accounting, internal audit, legal, risk management, operations, compliance and other non-investment professional personnel of ACREM or its affiliates who spend all or a portion of their time managing the Company's affairs based on the percentage of their time spent on the Company's affairs. The Company is also required to pay its pro rata portion of rent, telephone, utilities, office furniture, equipment, machinery and other office, internal and overhead expenses of ACREM and its affiliates that are required for the Company's operations. The initial term of the Management Agreement will end May 1, 2015, with automatic one-year renewal terms. Except under limited circumstances, upon a termination of the Management Agreement, the Company will pay ACREM a termination fee equal to three times the average annual base management fee and incentive fee received by ACREM during the 24 month period immediately preceding the most recently completed fiscal quarter prior to the date of termination, each as described above.
Certain of the Company's subsidiaries, along with the Company's lenders under the Wells Fargo Facility and the Citibank Facility have entered into various servicing agreements with ACREM's subsidiary servicer, Ares Commercial Real Estate Servicer LLC ("ACRES"), a Standard & Poor's ranked commercial primary and special servicer that is included on Standard & Poor's Select Servicer List. Effective May 1, 2012, ACRES agreed that no servicing fees pursuant to these servicing agreements would be charged for so long as the Management Agreement remains in effect, but that ACRES will continue to receive reimbursement for overhead related to servicing and operational activities pursuant to the terms of the Management Agreement.
Summarized below are the related-party costs incurred by the Company and amounts payable to the Manager:
|
Incurred | |
|
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Payable as of | ||||||||||||
|
|
For the Period From September 1, 2011 (Inception) to December 31, 2011 |
|||||||||||
$ in thousands |
Year ended December 31, 2012 |
December 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||
Affiliate Payments |
|||||||||||||
Management fees |
$ | 1,665 | — | $ | 621 | — | |||||||
Servicing fees |
17 | — | — | — | |||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
1,602 | — | 668 | — | |||||||||
Direct third party costs |
643 | 827 | 31 | 827 | |||||||||
|
$ | 3,927 | $ | 827 | $ | 1,320 | 827 | ||||||
Ares Investments
On February 8, 2012, the Company entered into a promissory note with Ares Investments, whereby Ares Investments loaned the Company $2.0 million. The note was repaid with $4 thousand in interest due under the note on March 1, 2012 with the proceeds from the sale of the Series A Preferred Stock.
As of December 31, 2012, Ares Investments owned approximately 2,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock representing approximately 21.6% of the total shares outstanding. In addition, as of December 31, 2012, Ares Investments owned $1,150,000 aggregate principal amount of the 2015 Convertible Notes.
|
11. DIVIDENDS AND DISTRIBUTIONS
The following table summarizes the Company's dividends declared during the year ended December 31, 2012 (amounts in thousands, except per share data):
Date declared |
Record date | Payment date | Per share amount |
Total amount | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
March 30, 2012 |
March 31, 2012 | April 02, 2012 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 450 | (1) | ||||||
June 19, 2012 |
June 29, 2012 | July 12, 2012 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 555 | |||||||
September 21, 2012 |
October 02, 2012 | October 11, 2012 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 556 | |||||||
November 7, 2012 |
December 31, 2012 | January 10, 2013 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 2,316 | |||||||
Total cash dividends declared for 2012 |
$ | 0.67 | $ | 3,877 | |||||||||
|
12. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
The following table summarizes the Company's quarterly financial results for each quarter of the year ended December 31, 2012 (amounts in thousands, except per share data):
|
For the Three-Month Period Ended | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
March 31 | June 30 | September 30 | December 31 | |||||||||
2012: |
|||||||||||||
Net interest margin |
$ | 610 | $ | 1,206 | $ | 1,491 | $ | 3,629 | |||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 508 | $ | (175 | ) | $ | (554 | ) | $ | 1,081 | |||
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders |
$ | (116 | ) | $ | (225 | ) | $ | (554 | ) | $ | 1,081 | ||
Net income (loss) per common share—Basic and diluted |
$ | (0.11 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.12 |
|
13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company's management has evaluated subsequent events through the date of issuance of the consolidated financial statements included herein. There have been no subsequent events that occurred during such period that would require disclosure in this Form 10-K or would be required to be recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012, except as disclosed below.
On March 8, 2013, the Company entered into a loan assumption transaction with a new sponsor group to facilitate the purchase of a Class B office building in Miami, FL that was collateralized by the Company's existing $47.0 million first mortgage loan. The interest rate on the Company's existing loan did not change. The new maturity date of the loan is April 2014 and is subject to a one 12-month extension option.
On March 14, 2013, the Company declared a cash dividend of $0.25 per common share for the first quarter of 2013. The first quarter 2013 dividend is payable on April 18, 2013 to common stockholders of record as of April 8, 2013.
On March 28, 2013 the Company co-originated an approximately $107.1 million transitional first mortgage loan on three properties located in Atlanta, GA. At closing the outstanding principal was approximately $94.7 million. As part of the transaction, the Company funded an approximately $26.7 million B-Note, while the approximately $68.1 million A-Note was funded by a commercial bank. The B-Note has an initial interest rate of L + 10.75% subject to a 0.50% LIBOR floor (with the benefit of any difference between actual LIBOR and the LIBOR floor on the A-Note and B-Note accruing to the B-Note; as the B-Note funds additional loan proceeds, the interest rate on the B-Note may decrease) and an initial term of 3 years.
On March 29, 2013 the Company originated an approximately $25.5 million transitional first mortgage loan on a property located in Overland Park, KS. At closing the outstanding principal was approximately $24.4 million. The loan has an interest rate of L + 5.00% subject to a 0.25% LIBOR floor and term of 3 years.
|
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), and includes the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. The consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments and reclassifications that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for the fair presentation of the Company's results of its operations and financial condition as of and for the periods presented. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include funds on deposit with financial institutions.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash includes escrow deposits for taxes, insurance, leasing outlays, capital expenditures, tenant security deposits, and payments required under certain loan agreements. These escrow deposits are held on behalf of the respective borrowers and are offset by escrow liabilities included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and loans held for investment. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions and, at times, cash held may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or "FDIC", insured limit. The Company has exposure to credit risk on its CRE loans and other target investments. The Company's Manager will seek to manage credit risk by performing credit fundamental analysis of potential collateral assets.
Loans Held for Investment
The Company originates CRE debt and related instruments generally to be held for investment and to maturity. Loans that are held for investment are carried at cost, net of unamortized loan fees and origination costs, unless the loans are deemed impaired.
Impairment occurs when it is deemed probable that the Company will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. If a loan is considered to be impaired, the Company will record an allowance to reduce the carrying value of the loan to the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's contractual effective rate.
Each loan classified as held for investment is evaluated for impairment on a periodic basis. Loans are collateralized by real estate and as a result, the extent and impact of any credit deterioration associated with the performance and/or value of the underlying collateral property, as well as the financial and operating capability of the borrower could impact the expected amounts received and are therefore regularly evaluated. The Company monitors performance of its investment portfolio under the following methodology (1) borrower review, which analyzes the borrower's ability to execute on its original business plan, reviews its financial condition, assesses pending litigation and considers its general level of responsiveness and cooperation; (2) economic review, which considers underlying collateral, (i.e. leasing performance, unit sales and cash flow of the collateral and its ability to cover debt service as well as the residual loan balance at maturity); (3) property review, which considers current environmental risks, changes in insurance costs or coverage, current site visibility, capital expenditures and market perception; and (4) market review, which analyzes the collateral from a supply and demand perspective of similar property types, as well as from a capital markets perspective. Such impairment analyses are completed and reviewed by asset management and finance personnel who utilize various data sources, including periodic financial data such as property occupancy, tenant profile, rental rates, operating expenses, and the borrower's exit plan, among other factors.
In addition, we evaluate the entire portfolio to determine whether the portfolio has any impairments that require a general valuation allowance on the remainder of the loan portfolio. As of December 31, 2012, there are no impairments on the Company's loan portfolio.
Underwriting Commissions and Offering Costs
Underwriting commissions and offering costs incurred in connection with common stock offerings are reflected as a reduction of additional paid-in capital. Costs incurred that are not directly associated with the completion of a common stock offering are expensed. Underwriting commissions that are the responsibility of and paid by a related party, such as our Company's Manager, are reflected as a contribution of additional paid in capital from a sponsor in the consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
Interest income is accrued based on the outstanding principal amount and the contractual terms of each loan. Origination fees, contractual exit fees and direct loan origination costs are also recognized in interest income over the initial loan term as a yield adjustment using the effective interest method.
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs are capitalized and amortized over the terms of the respective debt instrument.
Fair Value Measurements
The Company determines the estimated fair value of financial assets and liabilities using the three-tier fair value hierarchy established by GAAP, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. GAAP establishes market-based or observable inputs as the preferred source of values, followed by valuation models using management assumptions in the absence of market inputs. The only financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the Company's consolidated financial statements are derivative instruments. The Company has not elected the fair value option for the remaining financial instruments, including loans held for investment, secured funding agreements and other debt instruments. Such financial instruments are carried at cost. Fair value is separately disclosed (see Note 9). The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:
Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2—Prices are determined using other significant observable inputs. Observable inputs are inputs that other market participants would use in pricing a security. These may include quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk and others.
Level 3—Prices are determined using significant unobservable inputs. In situations where quoted prices or observable inputs are unavailable (for example, when there is little or no market activity for an investment at the end of the period), unobservable inputs may be used.
Stock Based Compensation
The Company recognizes the cost of stock based compensation and payment transactions using the same expense category as would be charged for payments in cash. The fair value of the restricted stock or restricted stock units granted is recorded to expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period for the award, with an offsetting increase in stockholders' equity. For grants to directors and officers, the fair value is determined based upon the market price of the stock on the grant date.
Earnings per Share
The Company calculates basic earnings (loss) per share by dividing net income (loss) allocable to common stockholders for the period by the weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding for that period after consideration of the earnings (loss) allocated to the Company's restricted stock and restricted stock units, which are participating securities as defined in GAAP. Diluted earnings (loss) per share takes into effect any dilutive instruments, such as restricted stock and restricted stock units and convertible debt, except when doing so would be anti-dilutive.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company does not hold or issue derivative instruments for trading purposes. The Company recognizes derivatives on its balance sheet, measures them at their estimated fair value using Level III inputs under an option pricing model and recognizes changes in their estimated fair value in the Company's results of operations for the period in which the change occurs. On December 19, 2012, the Company issued $69.0 million aggregate principal amount of unsecured 7.000% Convertible Senior Notes due 2015 (the "2015 Convertible Notes"). The conversion features of the 2015 Convertible Notes are deemed to be an embedded derivative under Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging ("ASC 815"). In accordance with ASC 815, the Company is required to bifurcate the embedded derivative related to the conversion features of the 2015 Convertible Notes. The Company will recognize the embedded derivative as a liability on its balance sheet, measure it at its estimated fair value and recognize changes in its estimated fair value in the Company's results of operations for the period in which the change occurs.
Income Taxes
The Company intends to elect and qualify for taxation as a REIT. As a result of the Company's expected REIT qualification and its distribution policy, the Company does not generally expect to pay U.S. federal corporate level income taxes. Many of the REIT requirements, however, are highly technical and complex. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that the Company distribute annually at least 90% of the Company's REIT taxable income to the Company's stockholders. If the Company has previously qualified as a REIT and fails to qualify as a REIT in any subsequent taxable year and does not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, the Company will be subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) and may be precluded from qualifying as a REIT for the Company's four subsequent taxable years. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain U.S. federal, state, local and foreign taxes on the Company's income and property and to U.S. federal income and excise taxes on the Company's undistributed REIT taxable income.
ASC 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. ASC 740 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company has analyzed its various federal and state filing positions and believes that its income tax filing positions and deductions are well documented and supported. As of December 31, 2012, the Company has not recorded a reserve for any uncertain income tax positions; therefore, there has been no interest or penalties incurred to date.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates include the valuation of derivatives.
Segment Reporting
For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company operated in one business segment. The Company is primarily engaged in originating, investing in and managing commercial mortgage loans and other CRE related debt investments.
|
The following tables present an overview of the Company's current investment portfolio, based on information available as of December 31, 2012. References to LIBOR are to 30-day LIBOR (unless otherwise specifically stated).
(amounts in millions, except percentages)
Loan Type |
Location | Total Commitment (at closing) |
Outstanding Principal |
Carrying Amount(1) |
Interest Rate |
LIBOR Floor |
Unleveraged Effective Yield(2) |
Maturity Date(3) |
Payment Terms(4) |
||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Transitional Senior Mortgage Loans |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Apartment |
Brandon, FL | $ | 49.6 | $ | 43.4 | $ | 42.9 | (5) | L+4.80% | 0.5 | % | 5.9 | % | Jan 2016 | I/O | ||||||||||||
Office |
Austin, TX | 38.0 | 30.8 | 30.5 | L+5.75%- L+5.25% |
(6) |
1.0 | % | 7.5 | % | Mar 2015 | I/O | |||||||||||||||
Apartment |
New York, NY | 36.1 | 30.8 | 30.5 | L+5.00% | 0.8 | % | 6.1 | % | Oct 2017 | I/O | ||||||||||||||||
Office |
Cincinnati, OH | 35.5 | 26.9 | 26.7 | L+5.35% | (7) | 0.3 | % | 6.0 | % | Nov 2015 | I/O | |||||||||||||||
Apartment |
New York, NY | 26.3 | 22.7 | 22.5 | L+5.75%- L+5.00% |
(8) |
0.2 | % | 6.5 | % | Dec 2015 | I/O | |||||||||||||||
Apartment |
New York, NY | 21.9 | 18.4 | 18.3 | L+5.75%- L+5.00% |
(8) |
0.2 | % | 6.5 | % | Dec 2015 | I/O | |||||||||||||||
Apartment |
New York, NY | 21.8 | 18.6 | 18.4 | L+5.75%- L+5.00% |
(8) |
0.2 | % | 6.5 | % | Dec 2015 | I/O | |||||||||||||||
Apartment |
Avondale, AZ | 22.1 | 20.6 | 20.4 | L+4.25% | 1.0 | % | 5.8 | % | Sep 2015 | I/O | ||||||||||||||||
Office |
Denver, CO | 11.0 | 8.3 | 8.2 | L+5.50% | 1.0 | % | 7.3 | % | Jan 2015 | I/O | ||||||||||||||||
Stretch Senior Mortgage Loans |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Office |
Miami, FL | 47.0 | 47.0 | 46.6 | (5) | L+5.25% | 1.0 | % | 6.6 | % | Oct 2015 | I/O | |||||||||||||||
Office |
Boston, MA | 35.0 | 34.8 | 34.6 | L+5.65% | 0.7 | % | 6.8 | % | Mar 2015 | P&I | ||||||||||||||||
Apartment |
Arlington, VA | 13.4 | 13.4 | 13.3 | L+5.15% | 0.3 | % | 6.1 | % | Dec 2014 | I/O | ||||||||||||||||
Subordinated Debt Investments |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Apartment |
Rocklin, CA | 18.7 | 18.7 | (9) | 18.5 | L+6.40% | (10) | 1.0 | % | 10.0 | % | Dec 2013 | I/O | ||||||||||||||
Office |
Fort Lauderdale, FL | 15.0 | (11) | 8.0 | 7.9 | L+10.75%- L+8.18% |
(12) |
0.8 | % | 12.1 | % | Feb 2015 | I/O | ||||||||||||||
Office |
Atlanta, GA | 14.3 | 14.3 | 14.2 | 10.50% | (13) | — | 11.0 | % | Aug 2017 | I/O | ||||||||||||||||
Total/Average |
$ | 405.7 | $ | 356.7 | $ | 353.5 | 7.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2012 | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$ in thousands |
Carrying Amount |
Outstanding Principal |
Weighted Average Interest Rate |
Weighted Average Unleveraged Effective Yield |
Weighted Average Remaining Life* (Years) |
|||||||||||
Senior mortgage loans |
$ | 312,883 | $ | 315,750 | 5.9 | % | 6.8 | % | 2.8 | |||||||
Subordinated and mezzanine loans |
40,617 | 41,000 | 9.9 | % | 11.4 | % | 2.4 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 353,500 | $ | 356,750 | 6.4 | % | 7.4 | % | 2.8 | |||||||
|
December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Carrying Amount |
Outstanding Principal |
Interest Rate |
Unleveraged Effective Yield |
Remaining Life* (Years) |
|||||||||||
Senior mortgage loans |
$ | 4,945 | $ | 5,055 | 6.5 | % | 6.6 | % | 3.0 | |||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2012, the activity in the Company's loan portfolio was as follows ($ in thousands):
Balance at December 31, 2011 |
$ | 4,945 | ||
Initial funding |
347,779 | |||
Receipt of origination fee, net of costs |
(3,540 | ) | ||
Additional funding |
4,096 | |||
Amortizing payments |
(180 | ) | ||
Origination fee accretion |
400 | |||
Balance at December 31, 2012 |
$ | 353,500 | ||
|
|
As of December 31, 2012 | As of December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$ in thousands |
Outstanding Balances |
Total Commitment |
Outstanding Balances |
Total Commitment |
|||||||||
Wells Fargo Facility |
$ | 98,196 | $ | 172,500 | $ | — | $ | 75,000 | |||||
Citibank Facility |
13,900 | 86,225 | — | 50,000 | |||||||||
Capital One Facility |
32,160 | 50,000 | — | — | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 144,256 | $ | 308,725 | $ | — | $ | 125,000 | |||||
At December 31, 2012, approximate principal maturities of the Company's secured funding agreements and the 2015 Convertible Notes are as follows (amounts in thousands):
|
Wells Fargo Facility |
Citibank Facility |
Capital One Facility |
2015 Convertible Notes |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013 |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||
2014 |
98,196 | 9,490 | — | — | |||||||||
2015 |
— | 4,410 | 14,420 | 69,000 | |||||||||
2016 |
— | — | — | — | |||||||||
2017 |
— | — | 17,740 | — | |||||||||
Thereafter |
— | — | — | — | |||||||||
|
$ | 98,196 | $ | 13,900 | $ | 32,160 | $ | 69,000 | |||||
Weighted average effective rate |
2.8 | % | 3.4 | % | 3.1 | % | 9.4 | % |
|
|
As of | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$ in thousands |
December 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||
Total commitments |
$ | 405,695 | $ | 11,000 | |||
Less: funded commitments |
(356,930 | ) | (5,055 | ) | |||
Total unfunded commitments |
$ | 48,765 | $ | 5,945 | |||
|
|
Restricted Stock Grants—Directors |
Restricted Stock Grants—Officer |
Total | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance as of December 31, 2011 |
— | — | — | |||||||
Granted |
42,162 | 25,000 | 67,162 | |||||||
Vested |
(11,082 | ) | (1,564 | ) | (12,646 | ) | ||||
Forfeited |
— | — | — | |||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2012 |
31,080 | 23,436 | 54,516 | |||||||
|
Restricted Stock Grants—Directors |
Restricted Stock Grants—Officer |
Total | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012 |
11,082 | 1,564 | 12,646 | |||||||
2013 |
16,080 | 6,250 | 22,330 | |||||||
2014 |
10,002 | 6,250 | 16,252 | |||||||
2015 |
4,998 | 6,250 | 11,248 | |||||||
2016 |
— | 4,686 | 4,686 | |||||||
Total |
42,162 | 25,000 | 67,162 | |||||||
The following table summarizes the compensation expense included in general and administrative expenses, the total fair value of shares vested and the aggregate grant date fair value of the restricted stock granted to the directors and officers of the Company (in thousands):
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Restricted Stock Grants—Directors |
Restricted Stock Grants—Officer |
Total | |||||||
Compensation expense included in general and administrative expenses |
$ | 285 | $ | 53 | $ | 338 | ||||
Total fair value of shares vested(1) |
182 | 26 | 208 | |||||||
Aggregate grant date fair value |
756 | 423 |
|
$ in thousands (except share and per share data) |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
For the Period From September 1, 2011 (Inception) to December 31, 2011 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders: |
$ | 186 | $ | (163 | ) | ||
Divided by: |
|||||||
Basic weighted average shares of common stock outstanding: |
6,532,706 | 19,052 | |||||
Diluted weighted average shares of common stock outstanding: |
6,567,309 | 19,052 | |||||
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share: |
$ | 0.03 | $ | (8.56 | ) | ||
|
The following table summarizes the levels in the fair value hierarchy into which the Company's financial instruments were categorized as of December 31, 2012 (in thousands):
|
Fair Value as of December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Level I | Level II | Level III | Total | |||||||||
Derivative instruments |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,825 | $ | 1,825 |
The following table summarizes the significant unobservable inputs the Company used to value the derivative liability categorized within Level 3 as of December 31, 2012 (in thousands). The table is not intended to be all-inclusive, but instead captures the significant unobservable inputs relevant to the Company's determination of fair values (in thousands).
|
|
|
Unobservable Input | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Asset Category |
Fair Value |
Primary Valuation Technique |
Input | Range | Weighted Average |
||||||||
Derivative liability |
$ | 1,825 | Option Pricing Model | Volatility | 16.4% - 17.4% | 16.4 | % |
The changes in derivative instruments classified as Level III are as follows for the year ended December 31, 2012 (in thousands):
|
Derivative Instruments |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Beginning balance, January 1, 2012 |
$ | — | ||
Written option sold specific to the convertible debt offering |
(1,728 | ) | ||
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives |
(97 | ) | ||
Ending balance, as of December 31, 2012 |
$ | (1,825 | ) | |
All financial assets and liabilities recorded at cost are considered Level III financial instruments (in thousands).
|
As of December 31, 2012 |
As of December 31, 2011 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Carrying value |
Fair value | Carrying value |
Fair value | |||||||||
Financial Instruments not recorded at fair value: |
|||||||||||||
Loans held for investment |
$ | 353,500 | $ | 353,500 | $ | 4,945 | $ | 4,945 | |||||
Financial Liabilities: |
|||||||||||||
Secured financing agreements |
144,256 | 144,256 | — | — | |||||||||
Convertible notes |
67,289 | 67,289 | — | — |
|
|
Incurred | |
|
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Payable as of | ||||||||||||
|
|
For the Period From September 1, 2011 (Inception) to December 31, 2011 |
|||||||||||
$ in thousands |
Year ended December 31, 2012 |
December 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||
Affiliate Payments |
|||||||||||||
Management fees |
$ | 1,665 | — | $ | 621 | — | |||||||
Servicing fees |
17 | — | — | — | |||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
1,602 | — | 668 | — | |||||||||
Direct third party costs |
643 | 827 | 31 | 827 | |||||||||
|
$ | 3,927 | $ | 827 | $ | 1,320 | 827 | ||||||
|
The following table summarizes the Company's dividends declared during the year ended December 31, 2012 (amounts in thousands, except per share data):
Date declared |
Record date | Payment date | Per share amount |
Total amount | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
March 30, 2012 |
March 31, 2012 | April 02, 2012 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 450 | (1) | ||||||
June 19, 2012 |
June 29, 2012 | July 12, 2012 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 555 | |||||||
September 21, 2012 |
October 02, 2012 | October 11, 2012 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 556 | |||||||
November 7, 2012 |
December 31, 2012 | January 10, 2013 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 2,316 | |||||||
Total cash dividends declared for 2012 |
$ | 0.67 | $ | 3,877 | |||||||||
|
The following table summarizes the Company's quarterly financial results for each quarter of the year ended December 31, 2012 (amounts in thousands, except per share data):
|
For the Three-Month Period Ended | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
March 31 | June 30 | September 30 | December 31 | |||||||||
2012: |
|||||||||||||
Net interest margin |
$ | 610 | $ | 1,206 | $ | 1,491 | $ | 3,629 | |||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 508 | $ | (175 | ) | $ | (554 | ) | $ | 1,081 | |||
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders |
$ | (116 | ) | $ | (225 | ) | $ | (554 | ) | $ | 1,081 | ||
Net income (loss) per common share—Basic and diluted |
$ | (0.11 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|